SLO Assessment Committee

Monday October 8, 2007

 

 

Present:  Larry, Cristina, Kurt, Beth

 

 

 

Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges

·                    Rubric for evaluating institutional effectiveness

·                    What they will be looking at re: SLOs

·                    We are in the Development phase (4 phases:  Awareness, Development, Proficiency, Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement)

·                    Establish authentic assessment strategies for SLOs = our current goal

 

 

SLO Assessment Proposal (process of assessment) – passed through Senate

 

Kurt’s conference – “Strengthening Student Success” - Mapping process

 

Core competencies

Departments – Programs

Courses

 

A Map - from Course Level SLOs – used to develop Departmental SLOs – find a place with the Core Competencies

 

How do we know that the core competencies are actually being attained?

 

Course level – Rubric

For example - embedded questions on a test used to assess core competencies, portfolios, etc.

 

All General Education courses should be assessed for SLOs

 

Core Competencies – which courses should be used to assess Core Competencies?

 

Team visit/other colleges – what can we do/what do you do to efficiently/simply meet these SLO assessment requirements? (Every student, every course?  What is required?  Can we use a representative sample of students?)

 

LTCC – no institutional researcher (at present)

 

We want to meet the requirements as simply and efficiently as possible – not too labor intensive for faculty (don’t want to take too much time and focus away from the classroom)

Keep it simple in order to get faculty buy-in.  If the process is too labor intensive and cumbersome – people won’t want to do it in a meaningful way.

 

How many courses this year (through the SLO process)?

 

Sampling – each department/area (each FT faculty member?) is responsible for x number of courses per year.

 

Begin with one course per year – go from there - Start with one course, then two courses, etc.

 

Example – Writing classes – writing an essay, criteria for assessing the essay. Every third essay – make a copy, have multiple readers assess the essay based on a rubric.

 

 

Timeline:

·                    October 26 – every faculty member identify their course, map that course to the core competency

·                    December 3 – assessment plan - decided how they plan to assess the course (our committee will give examples of possible assessment strategies – website)

·                    Assessment begins January 7, 2008

·                    Assess one course winter quarter

·                    By May 1 – Assessments are sent to SLO Assessment committee

 

 

Committee will look at assessments – evaluate according to our form

 

Form – how they’ve assessed the core competencies

 

Design a map for assessments – faculty can fill in

Have the core competencies listed – they can map their SLO to a core competency, back to a test item (for example)

 

Web based (forms, etc.)

 

Build a database

 

 

LTCC website – under Faculty menu:

Minutes for SLOs

Core Competencies

Materials from conference

Example courses for SLOs

Various reports for the State

Classes that have/have not been done

 

Phase One (2007-08)               One course per faculty member

 

 

Work into division meetings

 

 

Information item – at Senate meeting

Faculty buy-in to the process

 

 

Faculty self-evaluation – evaluate what you have done with SLOs in your class

(rather than an item on your tenure evaluation - Accreditation commission – wants SLOs to be attached to tenure evaluation)

 

 

SLO assessments due – combined 4 units

One SLO per unit

 

 

Student Services/DRC – filling out an ed plan, self-advocating with instructors, using request for test accommodations form, articulate one’s disability and related accommodations, etc.

 

 

Let faculty know – we do want to make this process as simple, easy, and efficient as possible

 

 

Our Assessment Plan

 

 

Adjuncts – paid extra for SLOs/Assessments

 

 

Phase 2 (2008-09) – find out who is doing Program Plans

 

 

Assessment – must be done by instructor – only the instructor knows how the students did in the class.

 

Deans – identify adjuncts – paid to attend a meeting – trained to write and assess SLOs

 

 

Full time faculty – one per year – 3 years = 150 courses (25% of our courses)

 

Focus on General Education

 

 

By year 3 – we will have assessed 60% of our General Education courses

 

 

How many Gen Ed courses?  How many are offered every year?

 

 

Faculty buy-in – very important

We are doing well with faculty buy-in – have SLOs from almost every major department.

 

 

SLO assessment committee – have something prepared for Convocation

“Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement” – how are SLO assessments going to improve the course?

 

Curriculum Manager -

Modification proposal

Reason:  SLO

MASLO

 

 

Kurt attended a Conference:  “Strengthening Student Success”

San Jose

Videotaped all presentations, all notes available electronically

The RP Group

 

 

Assessment workshop – Pasadena – early January 2008

 

 

Next Step:  SLO Assessment Committee members - come back to the next meeting with a class and a core competency map

Committee members - e-mail each other – the class, SLO, assessment, maps

Back to the SLO Assessment page